Open theism not essentially essentialist

by Tom

barthcigarAn offline conversation took me back to check out our earlier response to McCormack’s essay on open theism. Thought I’d repost the links to annoy you all.

McCormack’s Barth & Open Theism—Part 1 (Summary of McCormack’s essay)

McCormack’s Barth & Open Theism—Part 2 (Response to McCormack’s arguments)

McCormack’s Barth & Open Theism—Part 3 (Actualisism doesn’t preclude the open view)

(Picture here.)

One comment on “Open theism not essentially essentialist”

  1. tgbelt says:
    March 21, 2015 at 3:20 am

    For any wanting more clarification on McCormack’s (Barth’s) ‘actualist ontology’, see David Congdon’s explanation.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s